Search for: "Com. v. Price, T." Results 1 - 20 of 175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2007, 2:45 am
In his excitement to blog all things bright and beautiful last week, the IPKat overlooked Microsoft Corporation v P4 Com Ltd and another, a Chancery Division decision of Mr Justice Rimer last Wednesday. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
The facts in the second case, Vaughan v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
" [19] Additionally, individual's commitment to the firm has proven highly important in its potential to survive. [20] "[T]hat happened with a lot of dot com companies. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
And when its remaining merchants com­plained, Amex stopped raising its merchant prices. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  Doesn’t work that way; if the reason isn’t contained in the journal entry, it doesn’t toll the time… Another 2nd District case on allied offenses:  in State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
This is an area which is crying out for legislative intervention (see further the Law Commission’s report: “Law Com No 307, Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown, 2007) but, until that happens, the courts, regrettably, will have to do the best they can with the evidence they do (or don’t) have. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:50 am by Eric Goldman
ICANN wants federal regulators to declare the pricing scheme illegal so that it can take action against the operator, but if it doesn’t get bailed out by these government enforcers, it won’t do anything. * The most significant keyword advertising loss in Europe, Interflora v Marks & Spencer, was overturned and ordered for a retrial. * Treemo, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
Belton three months later in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm by Peter Rost
"Ahead of these give-backs, they dramatically raise prices," Dr. [read post]