Search for: "Com. v. Stafford" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2019, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The burden on COM’s cross motion shifted to the Sadiku’s, requiring them to submit evidence showing that there is an issue of fact which must be tried (see Alvarez v Prospect Hospital, supra). [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:27 am by Russ Bensing
Just how little wiggle room attorneys have in this area is indicated by the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in Disciplinary v. [read post]