Search for: "Com. v. Strong" Results 61 - 80 of 204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2012, 7:59 am by christopher
The publishing and academic worlds are watching the clock tick down to the perhaps historic decision of federal judge Orinda Evans in Cambridge University Press et al v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Idea was: glut in dot-com space. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm by Carter Ruml
Friday afternoon was shaping up to be the end of a relatively quiet day, when what should appear in the KYEstates email [carter {at} kyestates {dot} com] but a message from Judge Mark V. [read post]
30 May 2015, 10:28 pm
Devemos estar cientes, também, que o processo de individualização tem sido usado como sinônimo de várias coisas. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
This suggests some core criteria that should be present whenever any regulation of tool providers is considered:  1) strong social consensus that there are concrete and significant harms to be addressed; 2) strong consensus that obligations should apply equally across all providers; 3) strong consensus the regulation is appropriately tailored and enforceable as a technical and practical matter. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  Still, the state’s got a pretty strong case:  three eyewitnesses, a positive gunshot residue test. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 4:34 am
Com., Cabinet for Health and Family Services__S.W.3d__, 2007 WL 490946 Ky.App.,2007. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 12:33 pm by Jason Rantanen
    Shortly after the dot-com bubble burst, @Home collapsed and entered bankruptcy proceedings. [read post]