Search for: "Combs v. Combs"
Results 21 - 40
of 932
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
As the Supreme Court wrote in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:36 pm
But in 2021, in TransUnion v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
In Elekta Limited v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:36 pm
Unfortunately, a federal judge has dismissed the case, Doc Society v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 7:33 am
Of course, it can be hard to craft a sustained narrative about those cases when many deal with relatively obscure statutes that the court rarely examines – such as the Quiet Title Act, the subject of this year’s less than momentous decision in Wilkins v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 12:26 am
The prohibition came before Queensland’s State Court of Appeal in Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156, in which Ms Kamaljit Kaur Athwal argued that the ban was discriminatory. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am
Alleged judicial Islamophobia was an issue in Farid el Diwany v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 888. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am
The Court went on to find that the degrees of both visual and aural similarity between the two marks was low to medium, in all relevant territories.The Court carefully went through both parties’ sales evidence (with a fine-tooth comb, I might add!) [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:39 pm
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
Second, ProPublica charged that Alito should have recused from Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:38 pm
C.N. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:04 am
In Escobar v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:00 am
Goldsmith (Part I) — “There is no doubt that the AWF v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 8:09 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
See Doe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 3:06 pm
From Montaquila v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm
The Court of International Trade has issued the much anticipated (at least by me) decision on the merits in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia for “a necessary second level of judicial permission to begin combing through the records. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:28 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
