Search for: "Combs v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2022, 5:00 pm
In Truck Rent-A-Center v Puritan Farms, our state’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, held, "[a] contractual provision fixing damages in the event of breach will be sustained if the amount liquidated bears a reasonable proportion to the probable loss and the amount of actual loss is incapable or difficult of precise estimation. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
IPWatchdog combed through these decisions and provides some tips for those laboring against “broadest reasonable interpretations” that are, in fact, not reasonable.Kluwer Patent blog provided clarifications for Liconsa v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
But it happened yesterday when lawyers for Jean Combe Fritz filed a petition to recover Peruvian objects seized at Miami International Airport in Florida.Many forfeiture cases are rooted in the claim that cultural property was brought to the United States in violation of a federal criminal law. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
If it gets that far, we may eventually even want to hire a dedicated reporter to comb through the materials and regularly post stories on Mann. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:39 am
Gore "guideposts" (reprehensibility, ratio, and comparable penalties).First, the court observed that the defendant's conduct implicated only two of the five "reprehensibility factors" identified in State Farm v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 6:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Laureen Yellow Hammer/Combs (Child Custody) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Supreme Court hear our defense of S.B. 1070.”  (The state’s case is Arizona v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
We’ve blogged about state laws directed at ownership of (and privacy regarding) employee social media [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 1:45 am
The court must therefore make a determination on a statute that our circuit has already characterized as "tormented," Combs v. [read post]