Search for: "Commander v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 5,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2019, 9:58 am
by Dennis Crouch Allen v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 1:38 pm
Over a dissent, the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:22 am
In Ambrose v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 5:34 am
The patent infringement claims alleged in Potter's complaint are based on four distinct software products: (1) BlackBerry Voice Commands; (2) Google Voice Search; (3) Google Voice Actions; and (4) Windows Speech Commands. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:38 pm
As reported by the LA Times here, LtCol David Jones, the military judge in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:39 pm
The Recordnet.com reports on the non-capital referral decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:22 am
Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Government asked NMCCA for En Banc reconsideration in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
Supreme Court in DeWeese v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:25 am
The State chose to pass a law it knew was unconstitutional to endorse a decades-long campaign, fueled by national interest groups, to ask the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 11:06 am
Washington Commanders (D.N.D.): 1 Complaint 20 NCAI Motion to Dismiss 22 Blackwell Affidavit 22-1 Press Release 22-2 Letter to Commanders 22-3 NCAI Resolutions 23 Murphy Affidavit 23-1 Business Records Search 23-2 State Corp Commission 23-3 Marez v Polis Complaint NARF is repping NCAI here. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 8:54 am
Phil Cave briefly covered CAAF’s January opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
United States (the anti-commandeering doctrine) and NFIB v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:54 am
See eg., Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:34 pm
State juries must have at least six jurors, and five of six jurors voting to convict is not enough to satisfy the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:05 am
In Scharpen Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 2:34 pm
Summum, briefly stated: Thou shalt - or shalt not - allow Seven Aphorisms to go on display in a public park along with the Ten Commandments. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 7:41 am
State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 5:48 pm
To construe Printz v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:25 am
For example, in Reno v. [read post]
