Search for: "Commerce International Company, Inc. v. the United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
Indeed, courts in the United States recognized the businesses’ ability to eliminate the uncertainties of litigation by “agreeing in advance on a forum acceptable to both parties [as] an indispensable element in international trade, commerce, and contracting. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al., v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
International agreements could help reduce this dissonance, and rationalize surveillance rules to promote international commerce, law enforcement, protection of civil liberties, and the worldwide rule of law. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
In a crushing blow to consumers, on Thursday, February 21st, the United States Supreme Court again sided with big pharmaceutical medical device makers. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
In RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
United States (1977) recognizes a distinct Commerce Clause authority, beyond the three categories recognized in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Commerce Energy, Inc. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:20 am
Having decided two maritime-law cases during its October 2018 term, the Supreme Court will consider its third admiralty case in just over a year when it hears argument in CITGO Asphalt Refining Company v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
District Court in TikTok Inc. et al. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Luminant Generation Company LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 10:47 am
Clair County, Illinois, the Class Action Complaint accuses Defendants JGWPT Holdings, Inc., several affiliate companies including J.G. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:08 pm
, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:22 am
See Gucci Am., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:22 am
See Gucci Am., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:41 pm
United States; Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 12:52 pm
Here's a bit of context on GATS:As a member of the WTO, the United States has agreed to multiple treaties, including GATS. [read post]
