Search for: "Commercial Metals Company v. S" Results 21 - 40 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2014, 7:47 am by Robert Kreisman
The court affirmed the district court’s decision granting summary judgment and dismissing the lawsuit. nClosures, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
By Audrey Millemann In Tokyo Keiso Company, v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:43 am
COMMERCIAL UMBRELLA – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT – NECESSARY PARTIES – PRIVITY OF CONTRACT Brother Jimmy's BBQ, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 11:10 am
ArcelorMittal contends that, in sum, "Arillotta has forged contracts and purchase orders purporting to represent in excess of ten million dollars ($10,000,00.00) worth of commercial activities between the defendant companies and ArcelorMittal when, in fact, ArcelorMittal has not hired Arillotta or his companies to perform any of the work shown in the forged contracts and purchase orders. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:52 am
April 6, 2016 - 2 PM: In re Openings, Serial No. 86044043 [Section 2(e)(5) functionality refusal of the product configuration shown below, comprising a U-shaped channel that runs the full length of a door at its top and bottom, for "metal doors, commercial reinforced steel doors" and for "non-metal doors"].April 7, 2016 - 10:15 AM [ABA Annual IP Law Conference, Bethesda, Maryland]: Nash-Finch Company v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
The Court then stated that riveting metal to a van in furtherance of its conversion to an ice cream truck aids in transforming the auto's function, an activity which is distinct from "maintenance. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:33 am by Andres
During this year’s Super Bowl, Katy Perry baffled and endeared millions with an act that included a giant metal tiger, a floating star, and the real stars of the show, two blue dancing sharks. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:04 pm by CJ Haddick
Judge Goldberg dismissed the coverage suit, relying on what he called well-settled precedent stemming from a 2006 case, Kvaerner Metals Div. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:45 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 382 (08 April 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2011] EWHC 876 (QB) (08 April 2011) The Legal Services Commission v F & Ors [2011] EWHC 899 (QB) (08 April 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Moria & Anor v Bednash [2011] EWHC 839 (Ch) (08 April 2011) Batt v Royal Mail [2011] EWHC 900 (Ch) (08… [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:25 am
 See Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
 Music Group Macao Commercial Offshore Limited, et al. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:12 am by Andrew Frisch
The case was before the court on the defendant cleaning companys motion for summary judgment. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 4:57 am
In view of the "prevalence of online retailing" and the specialized nature of Applicant's products, the Board found Applicant's home webpage to constitute a "display associated with the goods" and therefore a proper specimen of use for the mark VALPRO for tools for power operated metal cutting machines. [read post]