Search for: "Commission of SSA" Results 1 - 20 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2012, 9:50 am by Sarah Lindsey
  The circuit court concluded that the Commission’s decision was arbitrary and capricious because the Commission failed to consider the SERB’s and SSA’s determinations. [read post]
3 May 2014, 1:23 pm by Bill Otis
This new policy, which has effectively all but eliminated mandatory minimums (since they simply don't get charged) has been the state of play for going on nine months.Second, the Sentencing Commission recently adopted a sweeping, all-comers-accepted two-level reduction in Guidelines offense levels for SSA-type drug defendants. [read post]
The recent issue of Bifocal, the bi-monthly Journal of the ABA Commission on Law and Aging has a great line-up of articles, including a piece by Social Security Administration (SSA) specialist Janet Truhe on Social Security Seeks Pro Bono Lawyers... [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 11:53 am by Aaron Lancaster
” The Act would establish duties of care, loyalty and confidentiality and would be enforceable by the Federal Trade Commission as well as state AGs. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:00 pm
The Wall Street Journal's Damien Paletta reports that "[t]he Social Security Administration has commissioned an independent review of the federal disability system amid concerns it awards benefits to those who don't deserve them and denies benefits to those who do. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 11:11 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
If an ALJ denies benefits as well, the claimant can file a request for review with the SSA appeals commission, which is essentially an in agency review process. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:03 pm
   SSA and MedVirginia were also among several federal agencies and HIEs that participated in demonstrations of the national network during the 3rd annual NHIN Forum in Washington D.C., which took place this December 15-16. [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:39 am by Bill Otis
 In the version of the SSA that passed the Senate Judiciary Committee in the last Congress, Sen. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Lisa Siegel
Last year, this fraud cost Americans $19 million, according to the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:04 am by Harry Cole
Now we can consider it blessed, along with SSA and SSW. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:09 am by FHH Law
That question has now been answered: in a notice published in the Federal Register, the Commission has specified September 12, 2016 as the effective date. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 11:52 am by Peter Tannenwald
Those broader agreements are considered to be SSAs and do have to be posted in the OPIF. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 12:51 pm by Melanie Osborne
 The claims assistant supplied the SSA some medical documentation, but the SSA found that the documentation did not show that her medical condition kept her from getting to work before 9:00 a.m. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:11 pm by Bill Otis
 In particular, it explains that, with so many of the SSA's objectives having been achieved in just the last few months, the prudent thing to do now is defer action while the country has a chance to assess how lighter sentencing is going to work  --  in particular, whether the massive promised savings will materialize, and whether, contrary to common sense and fifty years of experience, we'll be every bit as safe putting criminals back on the street as we have been… [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:11 pm by David Oxenford
” But beyond that, had the DOJ’s brief not been signed by the DOJ, there would have been numerous reasons for the Commission to give it little weight in its consideration of JSAs and SSAs The DOJ filing does not provide any factual analysis at all of the issues with JSAs, or any analysis of how many of these agreements promoted the public interest, and how many impeded it. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:43 am by Gregory Forman
Someone who is self employed or whose income is heavily dependant upon commissions or bonuses will show much greater fluctuation in income than someone who works solely for salary. [read post]