Search for: "Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Mills"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
In answering this question, the Court revisited its earlier decision in General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:29 am
We can’t expect anyone, let alone the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, to agree completely with everything we say. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 9:30 pm
U.S., _ U.S. _ (March 3, 2008): Sections [Internal Revenue Code] § §301 and 316(a) govern the tax consequences of constructive distributions made by a corporation to a shareholder with respect to its stock. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 9:10 pm
National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co., 417 U. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:32 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue 12-1085Issue: Whether the standard of appellate review for the Tax Court’s determination of a mixed question of law and fact, such as whether an expenditure is an ordinary and necessary business expense, is clear error or de novo. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:01 am
Commissioner, T.C. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:00 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, Docket No. 18977-09 (downloads as a pdf), filed just this week, U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
Commissioner, T.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The course in question covered the history of Western legal thought and philosophers such as Plato, Aquinas, Hobbes, and Mill. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am
The Commonwealth constitution precludes the issuance of debt backed by the Commonwealth’s full faith and credit if it would cause future annual debt service to exceed 15 percent of internal revenues averaged over the prior two years (plus amounts paid on account of guaranteed obligations). [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm
Food and Drug Administration’s deputy commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design field… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
The said Article 11 of JVA dated 7.1.1994 reads as under:- “Article 11 Arbitration Any and all claims, disputes, controversies, disagreements or differences between the parties arising out of or in relation to or in connection with this agreement, or with a breach thereof, which cannot be satisfactorily settled by correspondence or mutual conference between the parties hereto, shall be determined by arbitration in accordance with the then prevailing rules of Conciliation and Arbitration of… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Today they capture over 25% of that revenue. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
