Search for: "Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Park" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Target Group Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th July 2023. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
Target Group Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th July 2023. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am by Matrix Law
Target Group Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th July 2023. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am by Matrix Law
Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd, heard 26th June 2023. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Law
Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd, heard 26th June 2023. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by NARF
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Treaty Rights; Indian Taxation) United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 1:20 pm by Hannah R. Albion
Ohio law specifically states that a qualifying institution or organization is a charitable, educational, or state or political subdivision making a charitable use of its property; as determined in Chagrin Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Stanford… [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am by Jocelyn Hutton
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/11/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Stanford… [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 1:55 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/10/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Stanford… [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 1:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 21/10/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Stanford… [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 12/10/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Guest and another v Guest heard 3rd December 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees… [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:20 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 05/10/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Guest and another v Guest heard 3rd December 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees… [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/7/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Guest and another v Guest heard… [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 3:07 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 6/7/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 6/7/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:57 pm by Unknown
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Per Capita Payments; Taxation) Eight petitions for certiorari were filed on 8/16/21:Oklahoma v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Parkes QC heard an application in the case of Onwude v Dyer & Ors. [read post]