Search for: "Commissioner of Political Practices v. Republican Party"
Results 1 - 20
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
Commissioners Casey and Paredes are Republicans; Commissioners Aguilar and Walter are Democrats. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
See 15 USC 78d ("Not more than three of such commissioners shall be members of the same political party, and in making appointments members of different political parties shall be appointed alternately as nearly as may be practicable. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 5:24 am
But they are missing the bigger point: you cannot shut down political speech because it is directed at your political party and is offensive. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump and the Colorado Republican Party intervened as parties. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
[Case of Liberty and Others v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
Last week, former FEC Commissioner Hans A. von Spakovsky (now affiliated with the Heritage Foundation) moderated a panel discussion, sponsored by the Heritage Foundation and the free speech and election law practice group of the Federalist Society, that examined the practical impact and potential outcomes of the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 10:55 am
Republican Party of Virginia, 517 U.S. 186 (1996), where the Court held that the Act covered the Republican Party’s nominating process. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
In recent years the Republican commissioners on the FEC have acted in lockstep to block effective campaign finance regulation, even disclosure. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 7:10 am
The Federal Trade Commission is an independent regulatory agency that is supposed to have five commissioners, no more than three of which may be members of the same political party. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 10:51 am
” The two other Republican commissioners were appointed only one year ago. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:15 pm
Samsung or Oracle v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
No more than three commissioners can be of one political party. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:51 pm
Louis and Davis v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
The two Republican commissioners voted against it. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
The practical effect could be that nothing is any longer illegal. 2. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
(It's presumably not unaware of the problem today, but, even apart from political gridlock and Republican hostility to high-end enforcement, there is the fact that high-income partners who are benefiting from the aggressive tax planning have friends in both parties.)I'm not entirely sympathetic with this argument. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:00 am
Close followers of the cases FTC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:51 am
Center described the political consequences of redistricting, demonstrating its practical impact on Capitol Hill. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
