Search for: "Commissioner of Social Services v. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2021, 8:36 am
Ct., June 17, 2021), held unanimously that Philadelphia has violated the free exercise rights of Catholic Social Services by refusing to contract with CSS to provide foster care services unless it agrees to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. [read post]
Arthrex on Remand: Commissioner of Patents Drew Hirshfeld and the Problem of Shadow Acting Officials
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm
” Officials have relied recently on delegations to claim the power to lead the Social Security Administration, Bureau of Land Management, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, not to mention to serve as the Deputy Director of Homeland Security. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
City of Philadelphia, a case asking whether Philadelphia violated the Free Exercise Clause by excluding Catholic Social Services (CSS) from the array of private groups connecting children without families with willing foster homes, on the ground that CSS's religious beliefs prevent it from certifying same-sex or unmarried couples who want to become foster parents. [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:56 pm
Estate of Smith v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:34 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is investigating. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:48 am
But today it came back to life, with the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Big Brother Watch and others v UK. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
What’s this about the “Commissioner of Social Security” and claims arising under subchapter II? [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
The CJEU reference in Case C-362/14, Schrems v Irish Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:11 am
" In particular, To name a few: Should entities like Catholic Social Services—which is an arm of the Catholic Church—be treated differently than individuals? [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am
Mathews v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 21/07/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22nd June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard 14th-15th December 2022 Smith and another v Royal Bank of Scotland, heard… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision… [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
To Justice Barrett’s question about a social service agency raising a religious objection to interracial marriage, Windham answered by citing to Loving v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am
Target Group Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th July 2023. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 12:02 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:36 am
”Smith v City of Rochester, 255 AD2d 863, however, sets out one significant exception to the general rule that eating lunch is not work. [read post]
