Search for: "Commissioner v. Banks" Results 121 - 140 of 1,217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:07 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Jeffrey Keey - The recent First Tier Tribunal decision in HSBC Holdings Plc and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs brings positive news for UK companies aiming to undertake a fundraise or listing outside the EU involving the use of overseas depositary or clearance systems. [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Mandating disclosure of personal information for census purposes no Charter breach R v Finley, 2013 SKCA 47 http://t.co/3STTaTILF7 -> UK company's spyware 'used against Bahrain activist', court papers claim http://t.co/4NL4JO56Sv -> CLS Bank v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 8:49 pm
One important factor contributing to the change is attributable to State Street Bank and Trust Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:09 am by Patrick Hindert
Hall has approved a $72.5 million preliminary settlement of the Spencer v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 10:13 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2015) Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has written a report on the recent Supreme Court of India case, Reserve Bank of India v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The case of Banks v Cadwalladr concluded before Steyn J in the Royal Courts of Justice this week, with Cadwalladr arguing that her belief that the “covert relationship” between Banks and the Russian government was reasonable; the defence of public interest applies. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am by Daniel West
Norwich Pharmacal orders were originally commonly used in fraud case, for example against banks to identify customers who had used accounts with those banks to facilitate a fraud. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
BancorpSouth Bank: Clarifying the Scope of Copyright Preemption https://t.co/Mc3lCX3Yr4 -> EU privacy watchdogs to have review role in new US 'safe harbour' data transfers regime, says EU commissioner https://t.co/yKSFudYllW -> Banning encryption would be economically irresponsible and ultimately futile https://t.co/PI8YX5FVJQ -> Australian court rules that Google is liable for defamatory links https://t.co/BA6Zb6nf6F -> Link to DUFFY v GOOGLE INC… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:45 am by Arent Jan Oskam
The banks demanded repayment of the loans from the Port of Rotterdam and the municipality of Rotterdam, however neither were willing to honour the guarantees. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 2:30 am by UKSC Blog
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:02 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Dean & Dean Solicitors v Dionissiou -Moussaoui [2011] EWCA Civ 1331 (17 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Vinall & Anor v R [2011] EWCA Crim 6252 (16 November 2011) Carpenter, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 2568 (11 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Glenn & Co (Essex) Ltd & Ors v HM Commissioners for Revenue and Customs & Anor [2011] EWHC 2998 (Admin) (16 November 2011) Kisuule, R… [read post]