Search for: "Commissioner v. Banks" Results 121 - 140 of 1,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2022, 4:20 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 05/10/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Guest and another v Guest heard 3rd December 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees… [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:56 pm by Amy Howe
In October 2019, federal prosecutors indicted the bank on charges that included money laundering and bank fraud. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
Last Month in the Courts On 14 September 2022, the appeal brought under section 57 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“the FOIA”) in Greenwood v The Information Commissioner & Anor [2022] UKFTT 333 (GRC) was dismissed. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Statement by Commissioner Uyeda on Final Rule Regarding Pay Versus Performance Posted by Mark T. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:19 am by Jon L. Gelman
 “With the authority to issue stop-work orders as soon as we identify a violation, the NJDOL gained the ability to shut down a job when it finds workers are being exploited,” said Labor Commissioner Robert Asaro-Angelo. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Officials said while Vázquez Garced was governor in 2019 and 2020, she allegedly took campaign donations from a banker, Julio Martin Herrera Velutini, and a former FBI agent, Mark Rossini, who was consulting for the bank. [read post]
In Philipp v Barclays Bank [2022] EWCA Civ 318, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the Quincecare duty does extend to cover account holders who are individuals as well as corporates. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 12:45 am by INFORRM
Tomlinson LJ held that, although data protection legislation imposed duties upon controllers, that was insufficient of itself to give rise to a statutory duty for the purposes of the tort of breach of statutory duty: “you cannot derive a common law duty of care directly from a statutory duty” ([73] citing Customs and Excise Commissioners v Barclays Bank [2007] 181, 200, [2006] UKHL 28 (21 June 2006) [39] (Lord Hoffmann)). [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
In August 2017, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) imposed a fine of £100,000 on TalkTalk for their failure to implement appropriate security measures (see “Monetary Penalty Notice” (ICO, 7 August 2017) (pdf)). [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am by Emma Snell
The Marquette Law School poll, which was conducted just days after the court overturned Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/7/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Guest and another v Guest heard… [read post]