Search for: "Commissioner v. Court Holding Co." Results 41 - 60 of 767
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2023, 12:27 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Thirty-one years ago, the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Shipley v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Political Culture and the January 6, 2021, Insurrection” Expert Statement  Heidi Beirich (Co-Founder and Executive Vice President, Global Project Against Hate and Extremism)“The Role of the Proud Boys in the January 6th Capitol Attack and Beyond”Expert Statement Heidi Beirich  (Co-Founder and Executive Vice President, Global Project Against Hate and Extremism) and Wendy Via (Co-Founder and President, Global Project Against Hate and… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:50 am by Matrix Law
The Supreme Court holds that the procedural duty to have due regard to the need to avoid unlawful discrimination under section 149(1)(a) is not engaged. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As you might expect, however, my remarks today will reflect my views as an individual Commissioner and not necessarily the views of the full Commission or my fellow Commissioners. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
And Murdoch is his unindicted co-conspirator. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
Such doubts were confirmed by the High Court on 29 March 2023 in The3Million and Open Rights Group v Home Secretary [2023] EWHC 713, a judgment which resulted from follow-up litigation by the same groups (who as before were in general supported by the Information Commissioner who intervened as an interested party). [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 5:34 pm by Andrew Delaney
In this case, the court followed the statutory procedure and appointed commissioners to do the formal divvying up. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 7:19 am by Unknown
The circuit panel held that the two-layer for-cause protection for PCAOB members that the Supreme Court held unconstitutional in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
 See, Kaplan v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
 See, Kaplan v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Before I begin, let me make my standard disclaimer – the views I express today are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of the SEC or my fellow Commissioners. [read post]