Search for: "Commissioner v. Court Holding Co."
Results 121 - 140
of 763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
University Club reaffirmed the narrowness of the D.C. statute, holding that it doesn't apply to a club's ejecting a member because of his general political beliefs (as opposed to party affiliation).[8] Arboleda v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am
“If you overreach in the courts you will lose, and the very behaviors you are calling illegal will be validated by the court,” she said. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
(holding that a police commissioner is a public official); Coughlin v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:38 pm
Commissioner of Competition, 2017 FCA 236 [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
The issue of positive rights has been the darling of a certain clique within the legal and political academic (mostly but nt entirely) communities certainly since the pathmaking jurisprudence of the German Federal Constitutional Court (and then others) appeared to suggest its rationalization within domestic constitutional orders. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am
Three years later, in Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 4:53 am
” (Kakollu v Vadlamudi, 21A-DC-96 [Ind Ct App July 26, 2021]). [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision… [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
One of the first arguments in the Supreme Court’s October 2021 Term will be in Servotronics, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
I was desperate to hold onto my savings for my mortgage and bills. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:17 am
The judge held that the court would not hold a patent to be a dependent patent if it was susceptible to revocation. [read post]
12 May 2021, 4:45 am
However, the appeals court in Hovel v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
Lloyd addressed the court on the influential case of Markt & Co Ltd V Knight Steamship Co Ltd [1910] 2 KB 1021 (CA) which Google submitted restricted the scope of the representative action mechanism and prevented Lloyd’s case from proceeding. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm
Supreme Court in Lawrence v. [read post]
