Search for: "Commissioner v. Flowers" Results 61 - 80 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2021, 4:08 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 2:07 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 26th October, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Senate confirmed Rohit Chopra, currently a commissioner of the U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
First, Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Others v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (1) and (2). [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 R (on the application of TN (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor, heard 30 November… [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd, heard 12 November 2020 R (on the application of TN… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 22 June, the Supreme Court will hear East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Amanda Shanor
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
They were popular domestic terrorists even though responsible for, more than 200 bombings and dozens of robberies between 1963 and 1970 that left six people dead, and the kidnapping of the British trade commissioner, and the kidnapping and murder of a Quebec government cabinet minister. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
  Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:08 pm by Richard Hunt
Bd. of Commissioners of Louisiana Stadium and Exposition Dist., 2020 WL 874042 (E.D. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  And in 2008, he wrote a concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:48 pm by Emma Zack
Supreme Court agrees, Flowers’s conviction will be set aside. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  INS commissioners of yore found that when APA actions challenging their agency’s immigration decisions were brought in the various federal district courts, the local Assistant U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  INS commissioners of yore found that when APA actions challenging their agency’s immigration decisions were brought in the various federal district courts, the local Assistant U.S. [read post]