Search for: "Commissioner v. Gordon"
Results 1 - 20
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2023, 11:17 am
There is a slightly more detailed summary of the case on Gordon’s blog (link above), and for those who want to read the full judgment (which has possibly the longest and most unwieldy title I’ve ever seen), you can read it here: Harber v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX – penalties for failure to notify liability to CGT – appellant relied on case law which could not be found on any legal website – whether… [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
The High Court was comprised of Gageler CJ, Gordon, Edelman, Gleeson and Jagot JJ. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
Susan V. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:33 pm
Following Ecojustice’s application, Keurig entered into a consent agreement with the Competition Tribunal.[2] The Commissioner concluded that the Keurig’s representations regarding the recyclability of its K-Cup pods were false and misleading and did not meet standard practices. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
Such doubts were confirmed by the High Court on 29 March 2023 in The3Million and Open Rights Group v Home Secretary [2023] EWHC 713, a judgment which resulted from follow-up litigation by the same groups (who as before were in general supported by the Information Commissioner who intervened as an interested party). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 10:07 pm
The authors wish to thank Amy O’Bryan, Lawyer, for her contribution to this article. [1] Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2022] HCA 29 (Aristocrat Technologies) at [22] – [24] (citations omitted). [2] Ibid at [116] [3] Ibid at [22] (citations omitted). [4] Ibid at [117] (citations omitted). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 10:07 pm
The authors wish to thank Amy O’Bryan, Lawyer, for her contribution to this article. [1] Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2022] HCA 29 (Aristocrat Technologies) at [22] – [24] (citations omitted). [2] Ibid at [116] [3] Ibid at [22] (citations omitted). [4] Ibid at [117] (citations omitted). [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 11:05 am
The Commissioner’s jurisdiction pursuant to Education Law § 310 is appellate in nature, and an action is not ripe for review by the Commissioner until it is final and results in an actual, concrete injury (Appeal of Kerley, 60 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,915; Appeal of M.P., 59 id., Decision No. 17,848; Appeal of Parris, 51 id., Decision No. 16,261; seegenerally Matter of Gordon v Rush, 100 NY2d 236, 242 [2003]).Respondent wrote to me on… [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 11:05 am
The Commissioner’s jurisdiction pursuant to Education Law § 310 is appellate in nature, and an action is not ripe for review by the Commissioner until it is final and results in an actual, concrete injury (Appeal of Kerley, 60 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,915; Appeal of M.P., 59 id., Decision No. 17,848; Appeal of Parris, 51 id., Decision No. 16,261; seegenerally Matter of Gordon v Rush, 100 NY2d 236, 242 [2003]).Respondent wrote to me on… [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has lost an IPSO complaint against The Spectator over an article about his so-called “Russian riches. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 6:20 pm
In a keenly-awaited – and thus hugely disappointing – ‘decision’, the High Court of Australia has failed to satisfactorily resolve the question of whether patent claims directed to electronic gaming machine (EGM) technology developed by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd are directed to patent-eligible subject matter: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2022] HCA 29. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:30 pm
In the landmark decision SEC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
”[13]Another dissenting Commissioner said that “a number of [SEC] disclosure requirements have long related to environmental matters,” pointing to many “analyses from law firms explaining” SEC “disclosure requirements regarding climate change. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm
On 17 May 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v Granath [2022] EWHC 1181 (QB) by Lewis J. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
Gordon College v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:09 pm
(relisted after the Jan. 7, Jan. 14, Jan. 21 and Feb. 18 conferences) Gordon College v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Gordon College v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Eddy, and Sabastian V. [read post]
