Search for: "Commissioner v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
As is customary, my remarks this morning are in my official capacity as Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission, the Commissioners, or other members of the staff. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
As the threatened attacks in Rafah have begun, killing untold numbers of civilians, including children, we call on the international community and member states of the UN to act with the utmost urgency to fully ensure respect for the provisional measures ordered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case regarding the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On 9 February 2024, there was a hearing in The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Dr Robert Milton & Amy Louise Spencer KB-2023-004745. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has announced a campaign called “Think. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Website: http://cates1980.wixsite.com/cateswebsite Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/robert.piller.3979  Jeffrey Smith GE SOIL MICROBES NEW TARGET FOR AGRICHEMICAL COMPANIES. [read post]
While no recorded dissent or explanation was given by the Supreme Court, the 11th Circuit Court cited the Supreme Court opinion in Glossip v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am by Beatrice Yahia
High Commissioner for Human Rights said Israel has not responded to its request for access to Israel and Palestinian territories which would enable it to collect requisite information. [read post]