Search for: "Commissioner v. Sullivan" Results 121 - 140 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  Abramovich v Harper Collins, issued on 22 March 2021 Last Week in the Courts On 21 and 22 March 2021 Nicklin J heard a pre-trial review in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether, under Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
”[13]Another dissenting Commissioner said that “a number of [SEC] disclosure requirements have long related to environmental matters,” pointing to many “analyses from law firms explaining” SEC “disclosure requirements regarding climate change. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Judgment was reserved Judge Lynn Griffin dismissed an appeal in Peter Beswick v Information Commissioner [2022] UKFTT 360 (GRC). [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
Africa & the Future of International Criminal Law": Vernice Guthrie-Sullivan, ABA Africa Law Institute; Simone Monasebian, U.N. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 5:50 am by Justin S. Daniel
District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction in Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:46 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
The ACCC Commissioner Sarah Court commented that “this penalty sends a strong message to anyone considering selling fake Australian Aboriginal style art as the genuine article”. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:51 am
Saunders, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 14, 2021 Tags: Climate change, Disclosure, Environmental disclosure, ESG, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Sustainability Illiberal Governance and the Rise of China’s Public Firms Posted by Tami Groswald Ozery (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, April 14, 2021 Tags: Alibaba, China, Foreign firms, Globalization, Holding Foreign Companies… [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:46 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
The ACCC Commissioner Sarah Court commented that “this penalty sends a strong message to anyone considering selling fake Australian Aboriginal style art as the genuine article”. [read post]