Search for: "Committee Against Unfair Interest Limitations v. State of California"
Results 21 - 40
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2011, 10:57 am
The Court violated the express terms of the FAA and preempted state law protections of general application against unconscionable and unfair arbitration agreem [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
He currently serves as the Co-Vice Chair and Secretary of the Financial Institutions Committee of the Business Law Section of the California State Bar (2008 – present). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
On the other hand it is also true that many class actions serve the interests of both plaintiffs and members of the public, protecting them against illegal and unfair business practices. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
On 27 to 30 March 2023, applications by Associated News Limited (ANL) against seven claimants bringing misuse of private information actions against the Daily Mail publisher were heard by Nicklin J at London’s High Court. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:32 am
” –Betty Dukes, testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee, June 29, 2011 With the recent decisions in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
(Schnatter v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
Music Group Macao Commercial Offshore Limited, et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
Mark Whitaker ofMorrison & Foerster says the statstell a different story...Mark Whitaker (Partner, Morrison & Foerster - appearing in his personal capacity) stated that Congress intended that the ITC would provide IPR owners with broad protections against a wide range of unfair acts of importation. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
“In considering how to protect those interests, however, the State cannot engage in content-based discrimination to advance its own side of a debate. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
I am guessing that the settlement approximates the accumulated prejudgment interest and attorneys fees for the unfair competition claim. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
The recent Apple v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
In support of the argument against the California approach, the UMA drafting committee point out that the categorical exclusion of relevant evidence is uncommon for professional relationships and has been limited to public policy situations such as subsequent remedial repairs and payment of medical expenses. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:49 am
A similar result was reached by the California Court of Appeals in 2005 in Anderson, McPharlin & Connors v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 7:16 am
The only case cited by the RNC is a 1979 California Supreme Court case, Goldin v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 8:21 am
Unfair Immigration-Related Practices. [read post]
