Search for: "Committee on the Judiciary v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 41 - 60
of 570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2007, 9:54 am
SILVER, FARRELL, CANESTRARI, GREENE -- read once
and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
AN ACT to amend the judiciary law, in relation to the compensation of
state-paid judges and justices of the unified court system; to amend
the New York city civil court act, in relation to the compensation
paid to New York city housing judges; to establish special commissions
on compensation, and providing… [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Trump v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Weber Aircraft Corp., 465 U.S. 792, 802 (1984); Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
And this is why the House and Senate Judiciary Committees need to investigate what really happened here. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:08 am
Dorrance, and Chief Justice John Marshall also invoked it in Marbury v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:08 am
Meanwhile, across the street from the Capitol, the Supreme Court is closed Monday for Columbus Day, but the justices will resume their second week of oral arguments on Tuesday with arguments in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 12:10 pm
Leahy, Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary, the Department of Justice waded into the cesspool of patent reform throwing out its opinion on the provisions of the Patent Reform Act of 2007, S. 1145 and H.R. 1908. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:27 am
Larry Tribe is one of the leading constitutional law scholars in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:22 pm
" Noting that the Justice Department had recently urged the Court not to speed up another detainee case (Hamdan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:03 pm
It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
Nixon, President of the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:29 pm
To be sure, the purpose of the IFR is to seek to comply with a 2021 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Career appointees in the Departments of Defense and Justice co-operated in the peaceful transfer of power to President Biden. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:48 am
The biggest news from the order list was the announcement (which I covered in a separate post) that the court will weigh in on whether the Department of Justice must disclose secret materials from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation to the House Judiciary Committee. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 2:28 am
I haven't read the complete record of trial in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:25 pm
The SG is the Justice Department’s third in command and is responsible for representing the United States before the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:14 am
It would also override the Supreme Court’s 1999 ruling in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:09 am
When the United States is not a party, the solicitor general does occasionally file amicus briefs on behalf of the United States in cases involving rule interpretation. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
And amid all of that activity, the court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
