Search for: "Common Cause et al., Appellants, v. Internal Revenue Service et al"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2010, 6:47 am
(all) Amicus brief of the Cato Institute et al. (09-988) Amicus brief of eight states (09-991) Title: PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
FLOWERS, INC., et al., Debtors. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
LEMARTEC CORPORATION, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88% of perineum samples, 86% of… [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Talisman Energy, Inc.Docket: 09-1262Issue(s): (1) Whether federal common law tort principles or international law provides the standard for civil aiding and abetting or conspiracy liability under the Alien Tort Statute; (2) whether the mental element for civil aiding and abetting liability, under either federal common law or international law, permits liability based on a showing that the defendant knowingly provided substantial assistance to gross human rights… [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:22 am
Smith-Wythe Airport Commission, et al. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
" http://j.st/p24 Libertarian Party of ND, et al. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/cqz Father M, et al. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
In February the Higher Regional Court Munich (OLG) decided that YouTube and its service cannot be called to account for any user generated copyright infringements. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
In Barrick Gold Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
” Second, enforcement of federal forum provisions found in corporate charters comport with the internal affairs doctrine, a conflict of law principle that provides the law of the state of incorporation should govern questions regarding a corporation’s internal affairs. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
Each year our Year in Review comments on significant securities-related decisions by the Supreme Court, federal appellate courts and district courts, notes key developments in SEC enforcement, and summarizes significant rulings in state law fiduciary litigation against directors and officers of public companies. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
The focus of the paper is on the law of patents, with particular emphasis on leading appellant decisions from U.S. and Canadian courts. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
In California, for example, in the appellate court’s decision in Gomes v. [read post]
