Search for: "Commonwealth v. Chang, H."
Results 1 - 20
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2013, 11:18 am
The 2012 H-2B Final Rule would have significantly changed the H-2B visa program by imposing onerous and costly new conditions and requirements on H-2B employers. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
Petitions for the following workers are exempt from the H-2B cap: - H-2B workers in the United States or abroad who have been previously counted towards the cap in the same fiscal year; - Current H-2B workers seeking an extension of stay; - Current H-2B workers seeking a change of employer or terms of employment; - Fish roe processors, fish roe technicians and/or supervisors of fish roe processing; and - H-2B workers performing labor or services… [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley will argue for the commonwealth, and Lisa H. [read post]
28 May 2021, 7:08 am
He was defense counsel in The United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Proponents of the surtax estimate that the Commonwealth will raise $2 billion in new annual revenue from the tax increase. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
In 2004, the form of the certificate changed. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:00 am
McCall, Can a Pluralistic Commonwealth Endure? [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:45 pm
Ninth Circuit Judges Mary H. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm
Here’s a summary: H v Health Service Provider [2010] PrivCmrA 9: the Commissioner dismissed a complaint that a sale of a health clinic and transfer of files breached the National Privacy Principles. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
Geithner and Commonwealth of Virgina v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:57 am
by Associated PressExcerpts from Supreme Judicial Court decision: COMMONWEALTH v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 12:30 am
From The Dallas Morning News, there's a review of Will Haywood's Showdown: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court Nomination That Changed America (Knopf).The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:52 am
Much of the new statutory law is not different than what has evolved as judicially written law since the 1990 case, Gruber v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:08 am
Strassburger in Collins v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:10 am
In Lower Makefield Townhip v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:40 pm
To support this claim, NSE emphasized two provisions of the PRD Ordinance, to wit, §§ 402.4(H)(6) and (H)(7), which provide, respectively, that the location of proposed local streets “may be modified” and that the locations and configuration of buildings “may change” between the time of Tentative Plan approval and Final Plan submission or approval. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:40 pm
To support this claim, NSE emphasized two provisions of the PRD Ordinance, to wit, §§ 402.4(H)(6) and (H)(7), which provide, respectively, that the location of proposed local streets “may be modified” and that the locations and configuration of buildings “may change” between the time of Tentative Plan approval and Final Plan submission or approval. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:24 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
I hope that this case will change that; indeed, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently struck down the Michigan stun gun ban on Second Amendment grounds. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
April 24, 2014) (distributor of generic drugs had no power to change labeling unilaterally); Stevens v. [read post]
