Search for: "Commonwealth v. Cross"
Results 1 - 20
of 544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 7:38 am
It approved the US approach (Hilton v Guyot) to the effect that: ‘The application of the doctrine of comity means that the recognition of foreign decisions is not out of obligation, but rather out of convenience and utility’ [para 59]. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:06 pm
The ruling by County Judge Thomas Sponaugle in Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) V. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
In addition, opportunities for civil society or victim groups to intervene during criminal proceedings to advocate for compensation are limited, as highlighted in Nigeria v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Arneson, 766 F.3d 774, 796 (8th Cir. 2014); see also Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Surveillance A group of cross-party parliamentarians have written to the Information Commissioner to raise their concerns about the ICO’s approach to regulating facial recognition surveillance by private companies. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
La Crosse Health & Rehab, 138 Idaho 859, 864, 71 P.3d 458 (2003) had been wrong. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:28 am
The Commonwealth has appealed the ruling to the Appeals Court, where the case is currently pending. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
The case has an obvious cross-border flavour. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 8:58 am
For UK organisations engaging in cross-border M&A transactions with any potential US nexus, this increases the importance of thorough pre- and post-acquisition due diligence and compliance programme remediation and enhancement. 5. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 3:40 am
IndiaA Lakshminarayanan v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:03 pm
” See Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm
The passengers (supported by the Commonwealth Attorney-General and ACCC, as interveners) took a different starting point — the threshold question is whether the forum law, as a matter of interpretation, applies to the contract irrespective of the parties’ usage of an exclusive jurisdiction clause. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:32 am
On 6 October 2023, the English Court of Appeal (Court of Appeal) handed down its judgment in Mints v PJSC National Bank Trust [2023] EWCA Civ 1132. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
He had crossed the boundary between what a Chief of Staff may do and what Congress determined a Chief of Staff can never do. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
" Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
Blakely v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
Rudisill is supported by four friend-of-the-court briefs – including one filed by the Commonwealth of Virginia and supported by 32 other states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
