Search for: "Commonwealth v. Cross" Results 121 - 140 of 544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A contract violating Section 4 78 is illegal “and under our settled rules [New York courts] refuse to aid in it but leave the parties where they are” (Spivak, 16 NY2d at 168, citing McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465 [1960]; see also El Gamayel v Seaman, 72 NY2d 701, 705 [1988] [“As a matter of public policy, a contract to provide services in violation of [Judiciary Law§ 478] is unenforceable in our state… [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 8:05 am by Stephen Honig
— Proverbs 28:1 In the 2016 Massachusetts SJC decision of Commonwealth v Warren, the Court declared that running away from the police, without additional indications of wrongdoing, was not an admission of guilt. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
The commonwealth has long prohibited uranium mining, allegedly motivated by concerns about the radiological safety of uranium milling and tailings-management activities. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:33 pm by Kevin
You can get the text as it currently stands, but not without all kinds of cross-references and cross-cross-references. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:12 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The cable had lost its inviolability, for all purposes, including its use in cross-examination or evidence in the present proceedings. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:04 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting question now pending before the Massachusetts high court in Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Bancoult No 3) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 28-29 Jun 2017. [read post]