Search for: "Commonwealth v. Dixon" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
The passengers (supported by the Commonwealth Attorney-General and ACCC, as interveners) took a different starting point — the threshold question is whether the forum law, as a matter of interpretation, applies to the contract irrespective of the parties’ usage of an exclusive jurisdiction clause. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:00 am by ernst
Peter Gerangelos, University of Sydney Law School, has posted Sir Owen Dixon and the Concept of 'Nationhood' as a Source of Commonwealth Power, which appears in Sir Owen Dixon's Legacy (Federation Press, 2019): 56-79:Owen Dixon (wiki)The principal focus of this chapter is to trace from the reasoning of Dixon J, and those whom he influenced, the High Court’s evolving jurisprudence with respect to the concept of “nationhood”… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm by Gordon Ahl
Stacey Dixon; and entrepreneur Ron Gula, co-founder of Tenable Network Security. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Unrequited but still great: the dissent of Justices Dixon and Evatt in R v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:19 am by Joseph A. Ranney
 During the early 19th century, courts in all sections held that slaves entering free states became free if their master intended to stay on free soil indefinitely, but in Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Commonwealth, 702 S.W.2d 37 (Ky. 1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1010, 106 S.Ct. 3311, 92 L.Ed.2d 724 (1986).In Sparks v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Commonwealth, 702 S.W.2d 37 (Ky. 1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1010, 106 S.Ct. 3311, 92 L.Ed.2d 724 (1986).In Sparks v. [read post]