Search for: "Commonwealth v. Dougherty"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 6:04 am
However, earlier this month, in Cagey v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Howarth v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:31 am
Last year the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its decision in Robinson Township v Commonwealth. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 12:06 pm
This week the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court issued another ruling in a Marcellus Shale related land case. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 6:15 am
In Shaw v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:59 pm
On that date, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court decided the case of Harkness v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:21 am
In the case of Bereznicki v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:13 am
In Shaw v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:36 am
The Commonwealth Court addressed this issue in the case of Penn State University v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:05 am
The Commonwealth Court addressed this issue in the case of Penn State University v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
In one of the latest decisions handed down in the Commonwealth in the context of insurance bad faith litigation, Judge Jeffrey Sprecher of the Berks County Court of Common Pleas has doled out an $18 million dollar award against Nationwide Mutual Insurance along with an award of $3 million in attorney's fees in the case of Berg v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 1:48 am
Nov. 5, 2009).I thank Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, PA office of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention.This decision in Nehme is consistent with what has become the majority rule in the trial court decisions on this issue across the Commonwealth. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:15 am
In the case of Bereznicki v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:48 am
In Dougherty v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
v Pennsylvania P.U.C. et al. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 7:23 am
In Bockelman v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:13 am
In the case of Graham v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:21 pm
(Dougherty, J., concurring), which provides guidance on whether another decision striking down a statute as unconstitutional had retroactively effective or not.In the case of Dana Holding, the Court addressed the issue of the retroactivity of the law set down in Protz v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 8:33 pm
Justice Wecht dissented from this order, joined by Justices Donohue and Dougherty. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:25 am
In Cruz v. [read post]
