Search for: "Commonwealth v. Douglas"
Results 61 - 79
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Health Care Reform: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE DERAILS PART OF HEALTH CARE REFORM LAW, Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:59 pm
” [via Supreme Court of Washington Blog] Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:33 am
Saris, Douglas P. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
” [via FindLaw] Douglas Mickey v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
” Week of April 26, 2010: In Favor of the State or Government Thomas Douglas Arthur v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 4:17 am
V. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
” Knight v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
Without dissent, the justices in Porter v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 5:18 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Commonwealth of Kentucky. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
I have linked each company name to its corresponding record at the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office (or Secretary of the Commonwealth - whatever). [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
I have linked each company name to its corresponding record at the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office (or Secretary of the Commonwealth - whatever). [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:31 am
I am working on getting copies of these opinions and/or orders.Attorney Douglas noted that, consistent with the other previously noted cases on the consolidation of multiple claims issue, the following courts also refused to sever the claims against the tortfeasors from the claims against the carrier:Richard Hess v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
Two years ago, in Douglas v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 3:09 pm
Powell, Jr. wrote in the seminal case of Ford v. [read post]
