Search for: "Commonwealth v. Good, R." Results 1 - 20 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On January 19, 2011, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court issued an Opinion in the case of Brown v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
For more information about the constitutional history of the four U.S. commonwealths, see the following selected online resources: Duquesne University Thomas R. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Beware of the Statute of LimitationsIn a March 12, 2014 decision, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court held in the case of Daniel v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:42 pm by Michael Stevens
Commonwealth of Kentucky juror challenge for good cause and new trial 340. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 9:38 am by Diana L. Skaggs
Cabinet for Health & Family Services, Commonwealth of Kentucky, in the Interest of K.H., NO. 2011-CA-000896-ME and K.H. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 7:06 pm
Under Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation law, employees who quit their jobs are generally ineligible for UC benefits - unless the employee has a "necessitous and compelling" reason to quit.Today, the Commonwealth Court issued an opinion on this issue in Jacobs v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
Fat bitches r only good enough for stuffin thea mouth all tha tim with food n COCK too, lol. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:31 pm
§§1321-24]’s definition of “current employee” means former employee, as was held by the Commonwealth Court in this case when it erroneously relied on nonprecedential dicta in an earlier Commonwealth Court decision (Beitman v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:09 pm
The issuer of a builder's risk policy ("Commonwealth") was not required to indemnify contractors for deficiencies in the installation of a hardwood floor where the Court held that the faulty workmanship exclusion in the policy applied.Ploutos Enterprises Ltd. v. [read post]