Search for: "Commonwealth v. Hamilton, B."
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am
Analogous case law on these types of challenges suggests both that (a) there are no time limits on challenges to the validity of debt, and (b) if held invalid, the principal amount of the debt is simply not subject to recovery. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:55 am
Both the oversight board and the new Commonwealth administration have expressed a strong preference for restructuring the Commonwealth’s debt through the use of Title VI. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 10:37 am
The most realistic outcome seems to me to be (a) an exchange offer of the Commonwealth debt tied to realistic (non-punitive) reforms and (b) chapter 9 for the utilities. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
” With respect to the commonwealth, the oversight board and the commonwealth government are relying largely on PPPs to generate near-term growth, and, regardless of how one views the likelihood of achieving that objective, the text and intent of PROMESA make it difficult for creditors and other stakeholders to question or challenge that reliance. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
The Superior Court in Mangel relied on its own 2011 decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:27 am
Supreme Court decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
[B.] [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
L. 597, 660 n.236 (2009) (“[Alexander Hamilton’s] view was upheld in Powell v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
[B.] [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
Walker, Joshua B. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
§2244(b) with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Alice Hamilton, “Industrial Poisons,” 43 The American Federationist 707-13 (1936). 1937-04-26. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
Samsung: Having to Go Back to the E-Discovery Basics - http://bit.ly/Mo8AFp (Mike Hamilton) Will Samsung's Patent Court Doc Leak Backfire Spectacularly? [read post]
