Search for: "Commonwealth v. Labelle"
Results 101 - 120
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
For purposes of determining whether an Internet site conducts business directed to residents of the United States under subparagraph (A)(ii), the Commission may consider, among other indicators, whether (i) the Internet site is providing goods or services to users located in the United States; (ii) there is evidence that the Internet site is not intended to provide goods and services to such users or access to or delivery of goods and services to such users; (iii) the Internet site has reasonable… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 1:44 pm
Back in 2010, in the case of Jordan v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Some opponents of the effort to recall Governor Scott Walker have claimed that the recall provisions of the Wisconsin State Constitution are intended solely to permit the recall of elected officials when they have engaged in criminal or grossly unethical conduct. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:59 am
Covell v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am
Consider that defective air bags case above: [W]e will briefly review the history of products liability law and the crashworthiness doctrine in this Commonwealth. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 3:49 am
In Henry v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:58 am
“Despite the narrow FDA-approved indications for Risperdal, Janssen developed and executed marketing and sales plans designed to promote Risperdal for uses that had not been established to be safe and/or effective and to minimize the many risks associated with Risperdal's use,” Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 10:34 pm
In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 761 Optus was ordered to pay to the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty of $5.26 million for misleading advertisements (Optus 1 was previously discussed here). [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
Commonwealth, 2011 WL 2078563 (Ky.App. 2011), the answer is “yes. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:54 am
In the Lehigh County case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:01 am
Holcomb v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am
Beard, 633 F.3d 126 (3d Cir. 2011) (granting relief on Brady claim), with Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:20 am
Beard, 633 F.3d 126 (3d Cir. 2011) (granting relief on Brady claim), with Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
As with most Commonwealth jurisdictions, Canada (except the province of Quebec) has followed the English law of defamation. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:25 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Health Care Reform: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE DERAILS PART OF HEALTH CARE REFORM LAW, Commonwealth v. [read post]
