Search for: "Commonwealth v. Madison, V." Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2009, 10:34 am by Matt Cameron
Unfortunately for Melendez-Diaz, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts had already squarely addressed this issue in Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Marc DeGirolami
The course is sponsored by the James Madison Program’s Initiative on Freedom of Thought, Inquiry, and Expression, and by a grant from the Stanton Foundation. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
  The 1777 Virginia Assembly Race In April 1777, less than a year after the Declaration of Independence, the Commonwealth of Virginia held its first republican elections. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
  Georgia declared implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 10:27 am by Mark Ashton
  This creates an authentication problem under the recent Superior Court decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:40 am
(Taking context-optional note of thought-provoking quotes)[T]he act of state doctrine, 'whatever it might be – has no application where it is alleged that Commonwealth officials have acted beyond the bounds of their authority under Commonwealth law.' His Honour noted that, consistent with the principle enunciated in Marbury v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 8:56 pm by Jon Katz
How sad that this great innovation for the jury location in the courtroom was offset by Virginia’s shameful past of slavery that gave way to its shameful Jim Crow history that carried right into 1966 with the Commonwealth’s going kicking and screaming before the Supreme Court fighting unsuccessfully to salvage segregated marriage in Loving v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 3:39 pm
Yesterday, the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals handed down decisions in two RLUIPA cases: In Madison v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:37 am by Lyle Denniston
Suiza Dairy, et al. (10-74), Commonwealth officials argued that the order to raise revenue violates state sovereignty even though the funds would not come out of the Commonwealth government’s treasury. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Third Circuit Judge Cheryl Krause's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc yesterday in Lara v. [read post]