Search for: "Commonwealth v. McCann" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The ‘ingredients’ of such a claim are set out in a developing body of case law: The public body’s statement “must be clear, unambiguous and devoid of relevant qualification” (R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2009] AC 453 at paragraph 60). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
McCann v The State Hospital Board for Scotland (Scotland), heard 11-12 October 2016. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm by Stephen Page
There is an obvious and material difference between being represented in proceedings which could result in a person’s expulsion from, or detention in the Commonwealth, being represented, and a person being represented for the purpose of the preparation of a report pursuant to s 62G of the Act, the weight given to which would be determined after the parties referred to in such report had the opportunity to cross-examine its author during the course of proceedings in the court in… [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Edward A. Fallone
(Redlawsk & McCann, Popular Interpretations of ‘Corruption’ and Their Partisan Consequences, 27 POLITICAL BEHAVIOR 261 (2005), at 264) Other Progressive Era reforms included efforts to extend the franchise and widen the voting base, the successful push for the direct election of Senators by the people, and transparency provisions such as “sunshine” laws that required the prompt public notice of new laws and guaranteed public access to legislative proceedings. [read post]