Search for: "Commonwealth v. Melendez"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 2:30 am
In the recent case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:07 pm
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decided the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:22 pm
You can read the petition by clicking here, the Commonwealth's brief in opposition by clicking here, and my reply brief in support of the petition by clicking here.I had said that I would comment on the dissent in Melendez-Diaz. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:42 pm
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) and Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:09 pm
The Appeals Court addressed this issue in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:41 am
Massachusetts, No. 07-591, seeking review of Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:04 am
Here is a link to the Brief just filed on behalf of the 07-11191 Briscoe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:46 pm
The case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:46 am
The case is a follow on to Crawford and Melendez-Diaz. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:35 am
The case is Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm
The SJC announced its decision in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:56 am
Applying the “unique” Pennsylvania independence source rule, and pending two years before it was decided, is Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:08 am
On November 17, 2009 the Massachusetts Appeals Court issued its decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:25 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:25 pm
Massachusetts, No. 07-591, seeking review of Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:14 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
In the Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:27 pm
Accordingly, the defendant argued that he was being denied his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation under the United States Supreme Court's Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 12:19 pm
In the recent case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 8:29 am
First, some background: The case name is Commonwealth v. [read post]
