Search for: "Commonwealth v. Melvin"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2009, 7:06 am
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
Oct. 19, 2011 Orie Melvin, J.) [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:59 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:15 am
In a 5-3 decision (Justice Orie Melvin did not participate), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held: [W]e overrule the longstanding interpretation of the Commonwealth Court precluding employees who accept their employer's early retirement packages from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
A majority in Schmidt v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:20 am
While the Commonwealth Court repeatedly upheld the doctrine to dismiss suits by plaintiffs in the cases of Cochrane v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Black's dissent in Betts v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 9:30 pm
Black's dissent in Betts v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:00 pm
Black's dissent in Betts v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 9:28 am
Massey v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 1:00 am
Co. 2015 Nealon, J.) citing with “see” signal Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
Ayers On April 28, 2011, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court handed down a 3-3 plurality decision, with Justice Orie Melvin having recused herself from the matter, in the household exclusion case of GEICO v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 8:04 am
Meanwhile, Robinhood was hit with a class action complaint in the Southern District of New York for allegedly using the GameStop trading halt to manipulate the market on behalf of hedge funds (Nelson. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
This uncertainty is the result of an ever-growing split of authority not only between the Pennsylvania state and federal courts, but also among, and even within, the different federal district courts across the Commonwealth. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
§3050(a.4)(4)(v). [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
Bashman, one wise proposal to remedy this precarious situation would be to have appeals from the Superior Court heard by the six Supreme Court justices and a randomly assigned Commonwealth Court judge and vice versa for appeals from the Commonwealth Court. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:16 am
The rationale for the Supreme Court's decision in Marlette was based, in part, on its reasoning set forth in its previous decision in the case of Allen v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
Household Exclusion Upheld, Again On April 28, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court handed down a 3-3 plurality decision, with Justice Joan Orie Melvin having recused herself from the matter, in the household exclusion case of Geico v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
In Orlowski v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 11:24 pm
http://j.st/pDR Barton v. [read post]
