Search for: "Commonwealth v. PHILIP S" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2015, 11:36 pm
 In October 2012, a majority of the High Court ruled that even though the Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011 (Cth) restricted the intellectual property rights of the tobacco companies and regulated the packaging and presentation of tobacco products, the legislation was not an “acquisition” under section 51(xxxi) of the Australian Constitution, as there was no proprietary benefit or advantage conferred on the Commonwealth of Australia (JT International SA v… [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:48 pm
This week's employment law case of the week is Philadelphia Parking Authority v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held last year that the congressional map drawn by the Republican legislature in 2011 violated that state’s constitutional guarantee of “free and equal” elections. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:48 pm
Posted by Philip Miles, an employment lawyer with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:44 am
Jesus Guerra (Slaw) (TorrentFreak) (Managing IP) District Court of The Hague deviates from German BGH Orange Book decision: Philips prevails again: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:52 am
Posted by Philip Miles, an attorney with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania in the firm's civil litigation and labor and employment law practice groups. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am by David Pocklington
Kirpans in Queensland On Tuesday, in Athwal v State of Queensland  [2023] QCA 156, the Supreme Court of Queensland made a declaration that s 51(5) (Possession of a knife in a public place or a school) of Queensland’s Weapons Act 1990 was inconsistent with s 10 of the Commonwealths Racial Discrimination Act 1975 and therefore unconstitutional under s 109 of the… [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm by Stephen Page
  I am merely determining the question of whether the husband’s mother should be joined as a party to the proceedings. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Dr Rolph’s account of the tortuous process by which uniform defamation law was achieved in 2005 leads us closer to an understanding of the problem, by explaining that, until Commonwealth Attorney-General Philip Ruddock threatened to draft Commonwealth legislation based on the communications and corporations power, defamation law reform was rarely seen by state politicians as having any sort of priority. [read post]