Search for: "Commonwealth v. Price, R."
Results 1 - 20
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 6:04 am
However, earlier this month, in Cagey v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:31 am
Last year the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its decision in Robinson Township v Commonwealth. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:45 am
Mantine and Jessica R. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 6:15 am
In Shaw v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 12:06 pm
This week the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court issued another ruling in a Marcellus Shale related land case. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:09 pm
The issuer of a builder's risk policy ("Commonwealth") was not required to indemnify contractors for deficiencies in the installation of a hardwood floor where the Court held that the faulty workmanship exclusion in the policy applied.Ploutos Enterprises Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:36 am
A court ruling has revealed that the Commonwealth of Australia (i.e. the Federal Government) is seeking to recover $60 million it considers has been ‘overpaid’ for the anti-clotting drug marketed by Sanofi (formerly Sanofi-Aventis) and Bristol-Meyers Squibb under the brand name PLAVIX: Commonwealth of Australia v Sanofi-Aventis [2015] FCA 384.Sanofi was the owner of Australian Patent No. 597784, which includes claims directed to the compound having the… [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:21 am
In the case of Bereznicki v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:13 am
In Shaw v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:36 am
The Commonwealth Court addressed this issue in the case of Penn State University v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:05 am
The Commonwealth Court addressed this issue in the case of Penn State University v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
In one of the latest decisions handed down in the Commonwealth in the context of insurance bad faith litigation, Judge Jeffrey Sprecher of the Berks County Court of Common Pleas has doled out an $18 million dollar award against Nationwide Mutual Insurance along with an award of $3 million in attorney's fees in the case of Berg v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 1:48 am
Nov. 5, 2009).I thank Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, PA office of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention.This decision in Nehme is consistent with what has become the majority rule in the trial court decisions on this issue across the Commonwealth. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:15 am
In the case of Bereznicki v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 2:06 pm
On August 8, 2016, the SJC issued a decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:54 pm
The definition will be used for all Commonwealth laws, and will be based on the 2001 Report of the Inquiry into the Definition of Charities and Related Organisations, taking account of the findings of recent judicial decisions, such as Aid/Watch Incorporated v Commissioner of Taxation which extended the definition of charity to include further types of advocacy-based organisations. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:10 pm
Which is fine, except Barnes has already paid a pretty steep price for that very crime. [read post]
5 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania rules against Club Kama Sutra in dispute with city of Philadelphia5-5-2008 Pennsylvania:A divided Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has ruled in favor of old-fashioned dining etiquette, ruling that sexual activity is not an accessory use to a restaurant.The split seven-judge panel upheld a trial court's ruling against Club Kama Sutra in Philadelphia.In MAJ Entertainment Inc. v. the City of Philadelphia, the panel consisting of… [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
v Pennsylvania P.U.C. et al. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
By: John R. [read post]
