Search for: "Commonwealth v. Rush" Results 41 - 55 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2011, 11:06 am by David Lat
”)The McMahon video, as another tipster pointed out to us, was memorialized in the Third Circuit’s opinion in Wilson v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:17 am by David Lat
Legal and constitutional questions aside, I just think that guns are icky and scary and bad, and the world would be a better place if nobody had them.Given all my weird hang-ups about Asians and guns, I probably wouldn’t have made it on to the jury in Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
 Errors in filling prescriptions can result from similar-looking pills, difficult to read physician handwriting, and rushed work at pharmacies. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 4:47 am by jamison
When I practiced criminal law in Pennsylvania, there was a very famous pro-defendant suppression case called Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 3:19 am
Commonwealth Canvas, Inc.filed 01/08/07 1:07-cv-00167Gencor Pacific, Inc. v. [read post]