Search for: "Commonwealth v. Samuel S" Results 21 - 40 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2016, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Wednesday’s oral arguments in oral arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:46 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The first  introductory symposium was published here by Chukwuma Samuel Adesina Okoli and Richard Frimpong Oppong. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
The 1773 edition of Samuel Johnson’s dictionary defined “arms” as “weapons of offence, or armour of defence. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm by Carey Sias
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm by Carey Sias
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm by Toby Heytens
(It is perhaps telling that Citizens United is cited seven times in Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion for the court in Janus.) [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, the Court will consider whether federal bankruptcy law preempts a Puerto Rico law intended to allow the commonwealths public utilities to restructure their debts. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:03 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Bancoult No 2) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 22 June 2015. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Bancoult No 2) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 22 June 2015. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 4:15 pm
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, (2002), in which he held that a Native American holy man's free exercise rights were violated when Pennsylvania refused to grant him an exemption from a permit fee requirement for two black bears he kept. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 pm by Samuel Bray
This part of the chapter has taken on increased salience in light of the Supreme Court's recent cert grant in Liu v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 1:23 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
In a concurring opinion, Justice Samuel Alito argued that the Pennsylvania law may violate the Constitution’s dormant commerce clause. [read post]