Search for: "Commonwealth v. Samuel S" Results 41 - 60 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2016, 4:29 pm by The Federalist Society
Samuel Arsht Professor of Corporate Law at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, and who submitted an amicus brief in support of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am by Amy Howe
  In Puerto Rico v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:50 am by The Federalist Society
Samuel Arsht Professor of Corporate Law at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, and who submitted an amicus brief in support of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Wednesday’s oral arguments in oral arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, the Court will consider whether federal bankruptcy law preempts a Puerto Rico law intended to allow the commonwealths public utilities to restructure their debts. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm by Carey Sias
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Uganda Former Chief Justice Samuel William Wako Wambuzi has sued a local tabloid for defamation. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, 15-255, both one-time relists asking whether Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code “preempts a Puerto Rico statute creating a mechanism for the Commonwealths public utilities to restructure their debts”; CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
On cert., petitioners in both cases ask whether Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code “preempts a Puerto Rico statute creating a mechanism for the Commonwealths public utilities to restructure their debts. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:03 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Bancoult No 2) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 22 June 2015. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
"In this regard, the courts of Pennsylvania have held that trial court judges have significant authority to police the proceedings in their own courtrooms as may be required by conduct of counsel, as in Commonwealth v. [read post]