Search for: "Commonwealth v. Scales, J." Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am by JULIE BALL, TRAINEE, MATRIX CHAMBERS
Preliminary issue: Jurisdiction The preliminary issue was heard by the Divisional Court (Sir Brian Leveson PQBD and Leggatt J) on the 2 November 2016, and by Order of that Court, the IPT was not amenable to judicial review. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:36 am by CMS
  On 15 December 2020, the Supreme Court heard the parties’ submissions in the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited v State of Libya. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
Last month in the courts On Monday 18 December 2023, there were applications in the case of KB-2023-001023 Piepenbrock v Michell and others before Tipples J. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am by Stephen Page
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same date there was a hearing in the case of PTW v WPT before Lewis J who gave an ex tempore judgment. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:01 am
See Moreno, 413 U.S. at 541 (Douglas, J., concurring). [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Commonwealth, 262 Va. 253, 260, 546 S.E.2d 728, 731 (2001) (omissions in original) (quoting Kotteakos v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In Australia, legislation for the protection of journalists’ sources will go before the Commonwealth parliament[3]. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
For example, in 1847, showing a healthy suspicion for principles developed in the ecclesiastical courts and the Star Chamber, Australians came up with the defence of triviality, a defence drawn from Australia’s convict past, where nobody had much of a reputation – or, as Rich J more diplomatically put it, “to meet the hard conditions of pioneer days” (Lang v Willis (1934) 52 CLR 637 at 650). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) at [35] Eady J commented that it was “surprising how little authority there is within this jurisdiction applying the common law of publication or its modern statutory refinements to internet communications”, and the same is the case in Australia[5]. [read post]