Search for: "Commonwealth v. Stevens, M."
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 9:53 am
I suspect the Chief and Stevens will get Buono and Padilla, and note that I’m not saying “respectively” because I have no idea who will get what. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:04 am
From Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:56 pm
…and you’ll get something like today’s opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:33 am
The reading will be directed by Steven Maler, Artistic Director of Commonwealth Shakespeare Company (producer of free Shakespeare on Boston Common). [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:10 pm
Quoth Justice Stevens, in Illinois v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Cutler & Steven S. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
, (December 8, 2015).From elsewhere:Samuel V. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:14 pm
In 2002, in the landmark decision Atkins v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa,William S. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 2:29 pm
Likewise, Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2005, 7:06 pm
Commonwealth, 2 Gray 506; Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
UM/UIM STATUTE OF LIMITATIONSJudge James M. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Still a work in progress, but this is the rough plan for a new seminar I'm teaching this spring at Princeton on the subject, as part of the Initiative on Freedom of Thought, Inquiry, and Expression of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 2:57 pm
[I'm looking at you Justice Kavanaugh.] [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
(Op. by Stevens, P.J.E.). [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
R v M; R v C; R v T, heard 19 Jun 2017. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
Garber, Steven Baicker-McKee, Jean M. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Balikian & Cody M. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Peachey, Erez Reuveni, and Steven A. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
I therefore thought I'd blog the text of the draft brief here, and invite all of you to tell me why I'm wrong altogether, why I'm wrong on specific details, how the proposal could be improved, or even what parts of the proposal seem likely to be confusing to the judges. [read post]
