Search for: "Commonwealth v. Stevens"
Results 41 - 60
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm
., and other Commonwealth countries. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:31 am
Commonwealth of Kentucky (08-861), the Court, 7-2, reverses and remands the lower court in an opinion by Justice Stevens. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 10:03 am
(See post 79.)It's a shame that Stevens' tone was so polite and studiously non-personal that his scathing comment on Scalia's intellectual dishonesty went right over the head of the reporter.But lest anyone think that John Paul Stevens is a paragon of intellectual honesty, consider his concurrence in this spring's Georgia v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am
The Court also heard argument last week in Samantar v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 7:53 am
V. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie recaps Wednesday’s oral arguments in EEOC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:21 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am
At The Economist, Steven Mazie provides commentary on the Affordable Care Act at the Supreme Court more generally. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
In fact, my own state (the commonwealth of Virginia) has had a right-to-work law on the books for more than 70 years that prohibits precisely the sort of fees whose constitutionality was challenged in Janus v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 2:29 pm
Likewise, Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2005, 7:06 pm
Commonwealth, 2 Gray 506; Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am
In The Economist’s “explainer” series, Steven Mazie explains how the Court selects its cases. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
, (December 8, 2015).From elsewhere:Samuel V. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 5:11 am
: Massachusetts V. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:27 am
” At Credit Slips, Steven Lubben weighs in on (and responds to a column by Noah Feldman about) Tuesday’s oral argument in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58: The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 12:12 pm
Journalists are not defenseless, the SJC pointed out, citing the seminal libel case, New York Times v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Feb. 27, 2017 Shogan, Ott, J.J., Stevens, P.J.E.) [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
The Superior Court in Mangel relied on its own 2011 decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:27 pm
Commonwealth: What Happens if You Name the Wrong Party in Your Notice of Appeal? [read post]
