Search for: "Community Redevelopment Agency v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
CEQA: 2009 Year in Review
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 The Base General Plan conformed to the redevelopment plan. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
“The Year in CEQA: A Look Back”
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court, Supreme Ct. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Essex County Vo-Tech eminent domain complaint dismissed
29 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm by Bill Ward
Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. [read post]
New Jersey Eminent Domain Law Blog - http://www.njeminentdomain.com/
Michael G. Colantuono
15 Jun 2021, 2:38 pm by Molly Lockwood
Superior Court (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1091, government’s first win in that court in this subject area in decades. [read post]
Renne Public Law Group Blog - https://rennepubliclawgroup.com/shared-wisdom/
No more ‘blight blanket’ eminent domain: Part 1, does this look like blight to you?
16 May 2011, 8:41 am by admin
    San Diego Superior Court Judge Steven R. [read post]
AHI: United States - http://affordablehousinginstitute.org/blogs/us
2020: A Look Back at the Year’s CEQA Case Law
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The case is Parkford Owners for a Better Community v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“Bag It!” – Third Published CEQA “Bag Ban” Decision Upholds San Francisco’s Ordinance as Categorically Exempt While Slamming Plaintiff’s Arguments
10 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion in Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Sixth District Affirms Judgment Dismissing CEQA Action For Failure To Timely Join Indispensable Real Party Within Limitations Period Triggered By Filing of Second, Valid NOD; Court Rejects Plaintiff’s Arguments Based On Relation Back, Estoppel, and City’s Violation of Statute Requiring It To Mail Operative NOD
1 Jun 2021, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 580, 594.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Rejects CEQA Challenges To EIR For Petaluma River Apartment Project, Upholds Special Status Species Baseline And Public Safety/Emergency Access Impacts Analyses As Supported By Substantial Evidence
19 Dec 2022, 11:07 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Save North Petaluma River and Wetlands v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Another Call for CEQA Litigation Reform?  Second District Rejects NIMBY Group’s CEQA, Coastal Act, and Land Use Challenges, Affirms Judgment Upholding Approval of Zoning-Compliant And CEQA-Exempt Eldercare Facility On Flat, Graded, Vacant One-Acre Infill Site Surrounded By Residential and Commercial Development
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Pacific Palisades Residents Association, Inc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Rejects CEQA Challenge To City of Napa’s Reliance On Prior General Plan EIR For Housing Element Update Project
18 Nov 2013, 11:18 am by Arthur F. Coon
In Latinos Unidos de Napa v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Publishes Another CEQA Decision Setting Aside San Diego Lead Agency’s EIR For Failure To Analyze And Mitigate GHG Emissions Per 2005 Executive Order; SANDAG Announces It Will Seek Review Of Related Adverse Decision
8 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Rejects CEQA Challenges To San Diego’s FEIR And General/Specific Plan Amendments For Connector Road Construction Project; Holds Procedural Due Process Protections Did Not Apply Because Underlying Approvals Were Quasi-Legislative, Not Quasi-Adjudicatory
3 Jan 2022, 11:29 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 566-568.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Redrawing CEQA’s “Parking” Lines? Second District Holds Parking Impacts of Covina Mixed-Use, Transit-Oriented Infill Project Are Statutorily Exempt From CEQA Review, Rejects Related Map Act Challenge
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
San Mateo Community College Dist. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937, 945.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2019 CEQA 1st QUARTER REVIEW
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm by William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann and Glen C. Hansen
    Thresholds of Significance Negative Declarations Environmental Impact Reports South of Market Community Action Network v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Residential Project Exempt From CEQA Review Under Government Code Section 65457 As Consistent With Specific Plan For Which Program EIR Previously Certified; First District Also Holds New GHG Thresholds Do Not Constitute “New Information” Requiring Supplemental EIR For Specific Plan
10 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Concerned Dublin Citizens, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
A Decade of CEQA Developments
21 Sep 2021, 1:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Supreme Court, in Tomlinson v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Year in Review: Eminent Domain and Inverse Condemnation Decisions – 2011
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm by Lauren
Superior Court (Plotkin) 194 Cal.App.4th 210 Two and a half months after the Third District filed its decision in the Cobb matter, the appellate courts’ Second District published its own opinion on inverse condemnation on April 12, 2011. [read post]
California Eminent Domain Law Blog - http://blog.eminentdomainlaw.net
First District Holds EIR’s Analysis of “No Project” Alternative To City of Livermore Residential Development Violated CEQA By Failing To Discuss Feasibility Of Purchasing And Preserving Habitat-Rich Garaventa Hills Project Site, Also Addresses Significant Issues Involving Exhaustion Doctrine And Adequacy of Mitigation
4 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2019 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm by William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/