Search for: "Comptroller v. Taylor"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm
ShareThe argument Tuesday in Cantero v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:20 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Michael Tappin KC) Merck Serono SA v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] EWHC 3240 (Ch) (19 Dec 2023)This was an appeal by Merck Serono SA ("Merck") against Mary Taylor's refusal to grant a supplementary protection certificate ("SPC") in respect of cladribine (see Merck Serono S.A. v Comptroller 26 May 2023 BL O/ [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
.%20CASS City's position of Commissioner of General Services continued as jurisdictionally classified in the Competitive Class as appointment to the position [1] can be tested for via competitive examination and, presumably, [2] the duties of the position fail to meet all the requirements of §35(e) of the Civil Service Law and thus it cannot be placed in the Unclassified Service. https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/On-the-verge-of-retiring-Schenectady-s-General-17641238.php… [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
.%20CASS City's position of Commissioner of General Services continued as jurisdictionally classified in the Competitive Class as appointment to the position [1] can be tested for via competitive examination and, presumably, [2] the duties of the position fail to meet all the requirements of §35(e) of the Civil Service Law and thus it cannot be placed in the Unclassified Service. https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/On-the-verge-of-retiring-Schenectady-s-General-17641238.php… [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Federal Campaign Spending on Childcare Expenses Grows in 2022 Midterms OpenSecrets – Taylor Giorno | Published: 8/17/2022 Federal candidates are on track to spend more money on childcare ahead of 2022 midterms than in either of the previous two election cycles. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Taylor v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Taylor v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 2:19 pm
Ass'n of Mayors v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
: Lessons learned from Comptroller v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Steve Vladeck covered the decision for this blog; other coverage comes from Taylor Brailey of JURIST. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
* Lantana's lament: no technical contribution, no patent Jeremy gives the floor to Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP), who recounts the tale of Lantana Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents, Design and Trade Marks [2014] EWCA Civ 1463, a Court of Appeal for England and Wales decision which further explored the oldie-but-goldie issue of software patentability, this time considering a data transfer method.BREAKING 'GOLDEN BALLS' NEWS:… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:23 pm
It may not be Alice v CLS Bank International all over again, but Lantana Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents, Design and Trade Marks [2014] EWCA Civ 1463, a Court of Appeal for England and Wales from 13 November, shows that when it comes to disqualifying computer software from patentability [or patent eligibility, as the Americans prefer to call it] on the basis that it doesn't disclose an invention, the Brits can do the job at least as elegantly as… [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 3:28 am
The case is C‑364/13, International Stem Cell Corporation v Comptroller General of Patents, and it comes from a reference from the Patents Court, England and Wales. [read post]
