Search for: "Concepcion v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 465
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2016, 5:45 pm
Concepcion and American Express Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 1:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently reversed a decision by the California Court of Appeal wherein the state court refused to enforce a class action waiver in an arbitration agreement. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 12:16 pm
” The lawsuit was filed in 2008, prior to the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:21 am
In a 6-3 opinion, the nation’s high court first stated: The Federal Arbitration Act is a law of the United States, and Concepcion is an authoritative interpretation of that Act. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The New York Times recently published a pair of scathing articles about the state of arbitration in the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:07 am
Horton petitioned for review of this ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which overturned the Board in 2013. [read post]
Ninth Circuit’s Pro-PAGA Decision Is Not the Death Knell for Class Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
1 Oct 2015, 7:34 pm
The decision appears contrary to the United States Supreme Court holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm
Concepcion, 131 S. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Concepcion. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 8:04 am
For example, in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:59 pm
Bridgestone petitioned for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, arguing that the California Supreme Court’s ruling conflicts with the Federal Arbitration Act and the Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:00 am
Citibank, N.A., the Court will decide whether the Broughton-Cruz rule survives the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Louisiana, 14-280 (third relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, the California Supreme Court acknowledged that, under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 1:25 pm
Concepcion, 131 S. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:33 pm
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015, the United States Supreme Court declined certiorari review of Iskanian v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Concepcion. [read post]
