Search for: "Concerned Citizens Committee v. Board of Supervisors"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
The Court reasons:Because Williams spoke before the Nassau County Legislature not “as a citizen on a matter of public concern,” Garcetti v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:07 am
Citizens for a Green San Mateo v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:20 am
” (Citing Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am
” “Both Trustees actively solicited constituent input about official PUSD matters, including encouraging constituents to mark their calendars for upcoming Board meetings, to fill out surveys relating to Board decision-making, and to apply for volunteer committees run by the Board. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 11:19 pm
Superior Court (1988) 45 Cal.3d 491, in which the California Supreme Court concluded that implementation of special legislation concerning transportation facility funding in Orange was reserved exclusively to city councils and board of supervisors, not the voters. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:30 pm
Rptr. 3d 558, 566-567; South County Citizens for Responsible Growth v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am
The court held it was proper to apply this deferential standard even to the City Board of Supervisors’ interpretation of General Plan policies it did not adopt itself, but which were instead enacted by a citizen-sponsored initiative; it reasoned that “the Board’s role in implementing the General Plan, including its discretion to determine whether proposed projects are consistent with the General Plan, is at least as important [as whether… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
The court also rejected the argument that the MOU offered by the applicant to the Board of Supervisors constituted mitigation, finding that there was insufficient basis to conclude that the Board of Supervisors relied upon the MOU as any form of impact mitigation. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
The National Nurses Organization Committee filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) alleging Affinity engaged in unfair labor practices in terminating Wayt. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:10 am
The resulting class action, Handschu v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am
Board of Education in 1968 and Connick v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
Upon completion, our fellows find fulfilling work at other think tanks, congressional committees, private-sector firms, advocacy organizations, and the federal government. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
Upon completion, our fellows find fulfilling work at other think tanks, congressional committees, private-sector firms, advocacy organizations, and the federal government. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:30 pm
Rptr. 3d 558, 566-567; South County Citizens for Responsible Growth v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Board, the [individual] had no office at the hearing [see 600 West 115th St. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
In terms of other interesting developments during the second quarter, two courts of appeal ground through three of highly detailed cases: California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:42 am
" The decision indicates that "common interest warranting a qualified privilege" has been found to exist between employees of an organization [Loughry v Lincoln First Bank, 67 NY2d 369], members of a faculty tenure committee [Stukuls v State of New York, 42 NY2d 272], and employees of a board of education [Green v Kinsella, 36 AD2d 677]. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
.: The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace will host House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Eliot Engel for a discussion entitled Rep. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:14 pm
" Packingham v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
