Search for: "Concerned Members v. District Court" Results 61 - 80 of 6,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2013, 3:06 am by Andrew Trask
As the authors argue, several courts, including the Seventh Circuit in Kohen v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
In order to establish a federal diversity jurisdiction, the District Court relied on Mitchell v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:07 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Judge Hayes of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California today issued this ruling on the dispositive motions in Martin v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 4:19 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s ruling noting that the District's allegations concerning a “breach of fiduciary duty” and its negligence cause of action were time-barred by the three-year statute of limitations set forth in CPLR 214(4).Further, said the court, the District’s complaints alleging unjust enrichment and “constructive trust” had to be dismissed insofar as Margaritis was… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Ct., 40 Cal. 4th 360 (2007), a leading California case concerning prospective class member contact information. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Alex van der Wolk and Ronan Tigner
The post The Hague District Court’s WhatsApp Decision Creates Concerns for Mobile App Developers appeared first on Socially Aware Blog. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:22 am
The dissenters were concerned that the facts relied upon by the district court did not distinguish Tomko from other tax evaders. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:27 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
In what appears to be the first class certification ruling to expressly invoke the California Supreme Court’s recent Brinker decision, Central District judge Anthony J. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am by DR PAUL DALY, QUEENS' COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE
In Dover District Council v CPRE Kent [2017] UKSC 79, Lord Carnwath offered some important observations on the duty to give reasons in administrative law. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:15 pm
" Cotter sued in an effort to obtain a court order directing the school district to provide for his defense and indemnify him should he be held liable for damages.The Supreme Court agreed with the school district and denied Cotter's petition and dismissed the proceeding. [read post]